Fired by Fantasy: The Enamel Artistry of Haute Horology

Enamelling is a tedious process, to put it mildly. The raw material must first be ground into a fine powder, and then mixed with a suitable medium (oils or water are both used) to form a paint-like emulsion. This liquid is then applied like paint, before being fired in a kiln to vitrify it – the medium evaporates, while the powder melts and fuses into glass. There are variations to these steps, of course. Some manufactures, for example, choose to sieve the power directly onto a base of either brass or gold, and fire this “layer” of powder directly. Whatever the process, every step is fraught with danger. The product may crack during the firing process. Unseen impurities may surface as imperfections. Colours may react in unexpected ways. There are numerous risks to endure. Why, then, does this technique continue to be used?

Despite all its drawbacks, enamel still has a depth and nuance that cannot be replicated anywhere else. It is also permanent – vitrified enamel is essentially inert and, like noble metals, will remain unchanged a century from now. The different techniques used in enamelling are capable of creating a wide spectrum of products as well, from a single large surface free of blemishes, to microscopic levels of detail in an enamel painting. Perhaps the romantic aspect of this metiers d’art accounts for part of its appeal too; the time and touch of the enamellist is the perfect counterpoint to the watchmaker, with art on one side and science on the other.

Variations on Theme

Enamels are fired at various temperatures – or not at all – depending on their types. Grand feu (literally “great fire”) enamel is fired at around 820 degrees Celsius, although intermediate firings to “set” it may be at around 100 degrees Celsius, to boil the solvent off without fusing the powder. Enamels in general, including those used in miniature painting, may also be fired at around 100 degrees Celsius instead. Finally, there is cold enamel, an epoxy resin that cures and hardens at room temperature.

What difference does it make? For a start, higher temperatures are definitely more difficult to work with, since the enamel may crack during firing, or the subsequent cooling down process. The spectrum of colours used in grand feu enamelling is also more limited, as there are less compounds that can withstand the temperature. The choice of technique boils down to the desired product – for all its drawbacks, grand feu enamel has an inimitable look. A great monochromatic example is the Breguet reference 5177. Enamels, porcelains, and lacquers all share common properties of hardness, durability, and the ability to take on both matte and polished finishes. The three aren’t interchangeable though. Lacquer is an organic finish that is applied in layers, with each successive coat curing at room temperature before the next is added. Porcelain is a ceramic that is produced by firing materials in a kiln to vitrify them. Although enamel is also fired, it only contains glass and colouring compounds, and lacks porcelain’s clay content.

Raised Feilds

In champlevé enamelling, a thick dial base is engraved to create hollow cells, before these cavities are filled with enamel and fired. Because the engraving step produces rough surfaces at the bottom of each cell, the champlevé technique typically uses only opaque enamels. The method allows areas on the dial to be selectively excavated, and for enamels to be mixed freely within each dial. This is done to great effect in the Van Cleef & Arpel Brise d'Été (above and opposite), which demonstrates the brand's decorative chops with not only champlevé enamelling but also valloné and plique-à-jour (discussed later); valloné is a type of champlevé, with more depth and nuance thanks to hill-like reliefs.

Champlevé enamelling’s use isn’t limited to creating decorative art. In Parmigiani Fleurier’s Tecnica Ombre Blanche, for instance, it was simply the most appropriate technique. Although the timepiece has a simple white enamel dial, its surface is interrupted by three sub-dials and an aperture for the tourbillon. This watch was new in 2016 and not only has Parmigiani Fleurier not revisited it, what with the brand's renaissance, but no other brand has explored it either. As noted in our earlier story, the alternative here
would be to make a complete enamel dial, before cutting out the appropriate sections in the middle. One can, however, imagine the risks of doing that.

Is there a limit to the level of details that can be achieved with champlevé enamel? Patek Philippe may have the answer with the Ref. 6002 Sun Moon Tourbillon (right). Apart from the centre portion, which is produced using the cloisonné technique (discussed later), the timepiece’s dial is a work of champlevé enamel – even the railway track chapter ring was milled out in relief, before the recesses are filled with enamel and fired.

Engraving isn’t necessarily the only way to produce the cells used in champlevé enamel though. Hublot put a modern twist on things with the Classic Fusion Enamel Britto, by stamping the white gold dial base to create the raised borders between the cells. This not only reduces the time needed for each dial but also ensures uniformity between them. Subsequent steps, however, remain unchanged: the cells were sequentially filled with different colours of enamel and fired multiple times before the entire dial surface was polished to form a uniformly smooth surface.

Wire Work

Cloisonné enamelling is almost like the opposite of the champlevé technique – instead of removing material from a dial blank, things are added on it instead. The cloisons (literally “partitions”) here refer to the wires, each no thicker than a human hair, that the enamellist bends into shape and attaches onto a base to create enclosed cells. These cells are then filled with enamel of different colours, before the dial is fired to fuse the powder. The wires remain visible in the final product, and look like outlines of a drawing, with a metallic sheen that contrasts with the glassy surfaces of the infilled enamel.

Plique-à-jour (“letting in daylight) enamel can be considered a variation of cloisonné enamel, but the technique is a lot rarer owing to its complexity and fragility. Like its cloisonné sibling, plique-à-jour enamelling involves creating enclosed cells using wires, before filling them with enamel. In this case, however, there is no base. The lack of a backing can be achieved in various ways, but usually involves working on a base layer a la cloisonné enamelling, before filing it away to leave just the wires holding onto vitrified enamel. Since there is no base, plique-à-jour enamelling almost always involves transparent or translucent enamel that allows light through, which essentially creates tiny stained glass windows.

Van Cleef & Arpels has used the above technique to great effect. In the Lady Arpels Nuit Enchantee watch (seen here across both pages), a grisaille enamelled lower section supplies nightime context to an upper section with elements executed in plique-à-jour (the fairy's wings) and façonné enamel (to cradle the yellow sapphires) forms the foreground. Even the surfeit of sapphires, diamonds and rock crystal cannot overwhelm the artistry here.

Hybrid Theory

There are several “hybrid” techniques that combine enamelling with other decorative arts, and flinqué enamelling is arguably the best known given its long history of use. The technique combines guillochage with enamelling – a brass or gold dial is first decorated with guilloché, before layers of enamel are successively applied and fired. When this enamel coating is sufficiently thick, it is polished to create a smooth surface; the final result is a translucent lens through which the guilloché is admired. Depending on the desired effect, the enamel used may be colourless to impart a subtle sheen, or coloured for more visual oomph, like the trio of limited edition Rotonde de Cartier high complications unveiled at Watches & Wonders 2015. Vacheron Constantin has even adapted the technique by using guilloché patterns to mimic woven fabrics in the Métiers d’Art Elégance Sartoriale.

Developed by the husband-and-wife team of Olivier and Dominique Vaucher, shaded enamel (email ombrant) also involves the application of translucent enamel over an engraved dial. Instead of a regular pattern a la guilloché, however, shaded enamel entails the creation of an image in relief. This technique was last used in the Hermès Arceau Tigre, but the watchmaker does utilise other hybrid techniques, seen prominently on the unique Arceau pocket cheval punk.

The final technique here is Cartier’s enamel granulation, which combines enamelling with Etruscan granulation originally used by goldsmiths. The craft requires multiple steps and is extremely tedious, to say the least. Enamel is first worked into threads of different diameters, before these threads are chipped off bit by bit to form beads of various sizes. The beads are then sorted by colour and applied to the dial successively to assemble an image, with intermediate firings to set and fuse the enamel. As different colours of enamel fuse at different temperatures, there is a clearly-defined order for the assembly process; up to 30 firings are necessary, and each dial requires nearly a month to complete. Like shaded enamel, enamel granulation is a very recent development, and Cartier is reviving it in its Maison des Métiers d’Art in La Chaux-de-Fonds.

Metallic Content

A version of this story was first published in 2016. It has been udated with new images and information for this current issue

Paillonné is among the rarest enamelling techniques today, and practically synonymous with Jaquet Droz, which mainly works on special creations these days. The manufacture did have full-time enamellists who don’t just produce enamel dials, but also train artisans to perpetuate this know-how. The “paillon” here refers to the small ornamental motifs that are created from gold leaf, and are the calling card of the technique. Essentially, paillonné enamelling involves setting paillons within enamel to form patterns, with regular geometric ones being the norm. Emblematic of this technique is the Patek Philippe
Ref. 5077/100G models, as seen here. The technique begins with a layer of coloured enamel that is first fired to set it. Upon this layer, the paillons are positioned, before translucent enamel is applied and fired, thus “locking” the paillons in. Additional steps can be taken to create even more intricate designs. Before the coloured enamel layer is applied, for instance, the substrate surface may first be decorated with guilloché, which basically creates flinqué enamel that is then decorated with paillons over it. Alternatively, the substrate surface can be hand engraved – there are no hard and fast rules to this.

In lieu of regular patterns, Jaeger-LeCoultre opted for a twist on the technique, by distributing flecks of silver randomly on the dial instead. The result can be seen in the Hybris Artistica Duomètre Sphérotourbillon Enamel, whose enamel dial mimics the look of lapis lazuli. While not paillonné enamelling per se, Vacheron Constantin’s use of hand-applied precious powder deserves a mention here. In the manufacture’s Métiers d’Art Villes Lumières timepieces, gold, platinum, diamond, and pearl powders are affixed to the surface of the enamel dial by Japanese enamel artisan Yoko Imai. Instead of being covered with a layer of enamel, these particles sit atop them, and catch the light variously to mimic a bird’s eye view of a city at night.

Brush Strokes

Enamel painting is simply painting with enamel pigments rather than some other medium. The technique is challenging not just due to the canvas’s size, which makes it miniature painting as well, but also because of the multiple firings needed to vitrify and set the enamels, colour by colour by colour. Given the level of detail that can be achieved (as seen in the Patek Philippe Ref. 5531R here), however, this is
one of the few techniques that are capable of making their subjects almost lifelike. Consider Slim d’Hermès Pocket Panthère, which has the eponymous animal rendered in this technique, for example. Jaeger-LeCoultre has many examples, courtesy of its in-house workshops.

Grisaille enamel can be considered a subset of enamel painting, and is a specific method of painting white on black to create monochromic imagery. The black canvas is grand feu enamel that must first be applied, fired, and then polished to create a perfectly smooth surface that’s free of imperfections. This preparatory step is, in and of itself, already very challenging, as minute flaws are extremely easy to spot on such a surface – this explains why most watch brands offer white enamel dials, but black onyx or lacquer dials instead of enamel. Upon this black canvas, the enamellist paints using Blanc de Limoges, which is a white enamel whose powder is more finely ground than normal. To create micro details, fine brushes, needles, and even cactus thorns are used, and the dial is painted and fired multiple times to create the nuanced paintings grisaille enamel is known for.

Owing to its complexity, grisaille enamel is rarely seen. There are brands that still offer metiers ‘dart watches with them though, sometimes even with their own take on the technique. In the Métiers d’Art Hommage à l’Art de la Danse collection, Vacheron Constantin opted to use translucent brown enamel for the dial base, to impart a greater sense of depth, while softening the contrast between the two colours. Patek Philippe and Van Cleef utilise the technique in models featured earlier in this story.

This article first appeared on WOW’s Legacy 2025 Issue

For more on the latest in luxury watch reads from WOW, click here.

The Midas Touch: The Gift of Proprietary Gold in Watchmaking

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Day-Date in Everose gold with President bracelet

Everose Gold

These are all complicated points and we will be covering them briefly. We bring this point to the fore because fine watchmaking has been in the public eye itself recently for the investment angle. Specifically, some types of watches might qualify as alternative investment assets. To be clear, we have always argued (or at least cautioned) against this but we acknowledge reality and there are many of you, dear readers, who are intrigued by the potential of watches to not only retain value but also to grow it.

Some years ago, before we dared to comment on the phenomenon of investing in watches, we hinted at what a dark world this might herald. It was an Editor’s Note with the catchy title Watches as Currency, and watches cased in precious metal are the personification of this idea. If gold, in particular, is a kind of currency, then wearing watches cased in this material will really be like having cash strapped to one’s wrist. Well, perhaps just a digital display that indicates how much the watch in question is valued at. A good way to grab the attention of thieves you say? Welcome to the world of those who rock all-gold watches, and Singapore might just be the safest place on earth to do this.

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Day-Date in Everose gold with President bracelet

As a counterpoint, the watch-buying community knows all too well that the best deals available on the secondary market are timepieces cased in precious metals. That means any precious metal, not just gold. To be blunt, these are the types of watches that shed the most value, including examples from the biggest names in Swiss watchmaking. Generally speaking, the why of this is hard to explain, especially versus amped-up valuations on steel watches, but the hypothesis (from specialists, including us) is that the precious metal recommended retail prices have always been too high. This is especially true when any given brand also offers a model in a non-precious metal variant too.

Hublot Big Bang Integrated Time Only King Gold

Magic Gold

Hublot flexed its materials science muscle in 2012 with its demonstration of the properties of Magic Gold. While the manufacture was known for its forward- thinking ways prior to this, its fame was tied closely to synthetic materials. Hublot also has a proprietary gold alloy called King Gold, which owes its superior reddish hue to a higher-than-normal mix of copper, but this achievement was dwarfed by the arrival of Magic Gold, a type of metal matrix composite (MMC), which we covered briefly in Summer. Hublot is certainly not the only watch brand experimenting with MMCs but we focus here because Magic Gold is probably the most familiar material for watch cases, and remains a part of the core collection – Cerachrom and Ceragold are a different matter.

When it debuted, Magic Gold promised a golden revolution of sorts because it was meant to be a scratch-resistant gold alloy. It does not take expert knowledge to realise that gold is a relatively soft and dense metal that is prone to scratching – steel is significantly harder but no less of a scratch magnet, as they say in watch collecting circles. Hublot’s mission was to create and deliver a material that would qualify as 18k gold (as most gold watch cases are) that also exhibited a degree of scratch resistance that was all but impossible for a metal alloy. The manufacture decided to add ceramic (either as continuous strands or particulates) to a gold matrix to achieve this end. Nothing like this had been tried before in watchmaking so Hublot turned to the materials science experts at the EPFL in Lausanne. The manufacture has its own research and development facility, but fundamental research is impossible to do in a silo.

The materials specialists began with selecting their raw materials. This included 24k gold, aluminium, and boron carbide – boron carbide is a ceramic and is the third hardest substance known to humans. The proportions used were as follows: 75 percent (gold), 3 percent (aluminium) and 22 percent (boron carbide). Boron carbide powder is first compacted into a desired shape before being sintered to form a porous solid. Pure molten 24k gold is then forced into these pores under 200 bars of pressure – Hublot once described this as forcing water into a room full of footballs (EuropaStar, 2011). This revealing metaphor indicates that rather than the ceramic being the matrix that holds gold, it is the other way around. This is perfectly in line with Magic Gold being an MMC of course. Needless to say, Magic Gold is harder and more resistant to scratches than traditional gold alloys, while still maintaining the luxurious appearance and properties of gold. How tough is it, exactly? Well, apparently only diamond tools can make a dent in Magic Gold.

To machine Magic Gold, CNC machines equipped with ultrasonic cutters and diamond-tipped tools had to be specially ordered from Germany. Our last update on Magic Gold noted that 28 bezels in Magic Gold took three weeks to machine, and that only between 30-40 complete cases could be produced monthly. This is unlikely to have changed as Magic Gold remains truly rare in the Hublot assortment. It is no small thing that this innovation remains in play, and it has had more than 10 years now of testing Magic Gold in the wild. No solution is perfect, and Magic Gold may yet receive an update in the years to come.

Hublot Square Bang Unico Ceramic Magic Gold

Sedna Gold

Qualified honesty has everything to do with why watch brands with big industrial bases tend to flex materials science credentials with creations that advertise their expertise boldly. While Sedna gold was once associated exclusively with Omega, which introduced it in 2013, it is now a staple part of Blancpain offerings too. Needless to say, both brands are a part of the Swatch Group universe and the presence of Sedna gold at both brands is only one marker of the synergies at play. With this fact in mind, we will acknowledge the material developments with precious metals at Omega but would be remiss in our duties as a specialist commentator if we did not note the great work done at Rado, Tissot and Swatch itself in the area of ceramics, composites and polymers (various plastics).

Omega's visualisation of the constituents parts of Sedna gold

All of the above is just proof positive that Swatch Group knows how to do fundamental research into new materials and how to industrialise the same. While in 2016 we wrote that Omega was making waves with its anti-magnetic movements, today we could report that many Swatch Group brands have followed suit. LiquidMetal, a zirconium-based amorphous alloy that gets inlaid into ceramic bezels using a combination of high heat and high pressure, was also deployed by Omega first, but has since been adopted by Blancpain. When it comes to case materials proper, Omega was also first out of the gate with Ceragold in 2012, which was a combination of ceramic and gold, although not quite rising to the level of Magic Gold.

Blancpain Fifty Fathoms Bathyscaphe Cortina Watch 50th Anniversary

While Ceragold is indeed a niche material for Omega, Sedna gold is anything but. Named after the red planetoid which was once the furthest observed object of that mass in our solar system, the 18k alloy is a proprietary blend of gold, copper and palladium. Like other rose gold alloys, Sedna owes its distinctive colour to its copper content. The palladium content functions to give the colour long-term stability, much as platinum does in other alloys. While Omega has used Sedna gold aggressively, with the material mostly supplanting traditional rose gold in all collections, Blancpain is currently limiting it to just the Fifty Fathoms Bathyscaphe collection.

It would be remiss of us to neglect Omega’s other precious metal alloy efforts in recent years, which range from Canopus gold to perhaps the best-known of all proprietary blends, Moonshine gold. Of course, there the key messaging was handled by Swatch, which actually used it in a version of the MoonSwatch. We say this is the most widely recognised brand-owned gold alloy because Swatch has a huge reach – the Mission to Moonshine watch is probably one of the most popular Swatch models of 2023 – and it never fails to mention that Moonshine is an Omega trademark.

A. Lange & Söhne Datograph Perpetual Tourbillon Honeygold "Lumen"

Honey Gold

Also returning in this updated list is the alloy introduced by A. Lange & Söhne in 2010. It originally appeared in the Homage to F.A. Lange trio of limited edition watches and is known officially as Honeygold; we typically list it as honey gold as a matter of house style. The Glashütte manufacture has been remarkably consistent in keeping the use of honey gold as limited as possible. It was only five years after its auspicious and audacious debut that A. Lange & Söhne decided to roll it out again, this time at Watches and Wonders 2015.

At this Hong Kong precursor to the grand Geneva show, the 1815 200th Anniversary F.A. Lange debuted as a 200-piece limited edition. Subsequently, honey gold has featured in a handful of releases, not all of which are related at all to F. A. Lange. This year, it is the Datograph Perpetual Tourbillon Honeygold Lumen, which features prominently elsewhere this issue. Other key models in this proprietary gold alloy are the Zeitwerk Minute Repeater (last year) and standard Zeitwerk (2021) watches; a second trio of Homage to F.A. Lange watches (2020); and Langematik Perpetual (2019).

Aesthetically, honey gold’s hue falls between its pink and yellow siblings, with a noticeably lower saturation – it is paler, yet redder than yellow gold, and has a marked resemblance to honey (no duh). This alloy’s colour stems from its higher proportions of copper vis-à-vis regular yellow gold, and the addition of zinc; obviously, this is still an 18k alloy so the proportions are in the remaining 25% of the alloy that are not gold.

Honey gold was not developed by A. Lange & Sohne with only aesthetics in mind; this was not even the primary reason. Instead, the manufacture was keen on creating a gold alloy that was more scratch-resistant for its cases. With a hardness of 320 Vickers, honey gold has around twice the hardness of standard 18k yellow gold, which lives in the 150 to 160 Vickers range. The result, by all accounts, is a hardier watch case that is less prone to dings and scratches,

Despite its greater hardness, honey gold is not necessarily more difficult to work. Any equipment that is primed to machine steel cases, which are even harder, is more than capable of handling honey gold; A. Lange & Söhne does not make cases anyway. When used in movement components, however, the material does present challenges to the finisseurs. The Homage to F.A. Lange watches have balance cocks executed in honey gold rather than German silver, as is typically the case. Hand-engraving these pieces with the manufacture’s signature floral motif is thus more difficult and time-consuming, while also requiring a special set of burins with harder blades.

This page: IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar

Armour Gold

A recent addition to the parade of proprietary gold alloys, Armour Gold is IWC’s first ride into the realm of precious metals but certainly not its first rodeo in the material innovation circuit. Like many of the watch brands featured here, IWC is known for playing with materials, including being the first top-tier brand to use ceramic for its cases. This became an IWC specialty in some ways, with observers always looking forward to hardy yet aesthetically pleasing materials from the brand’s new releases. In this way, Armour Gold is very much playing to established strengths in IWC’s watches-for-professionals game.

In our chat with the professionals at IWC in Geneva, we got into the substance of Armour Gold, in passing. The gist of it had to do with functional relevance, even when the matter of aesthetics was weightier. So, yes, Armour Gold does purport to live up to its name; in fact, every alloy on this list has some degree of functional distinctiveness, though we did not perform any tests ourselves. IWC introduced its proprietary gold rather quietly, back in 2019; a number of journalists were surprised that Armour Gold was not new for this year.

IWC Portugieser Hand- Wound Tourbillon Day & Night

For IWC, the pertinent qualities of Armour Gold are its resistance to wear and we know the manufacture would not have bothered if it was just to have a different colour. When the material was introduced with the Big Pilot’s Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince, the brand noted that it was its first experiment with so-called hard gold. This kind of gold is approximately five to 10 times more wear-resistant than standard red gold. By wear-resistant, we understand this to mean that the material resists scratches better than regular gold alloys. In another press release for a watch that used Armour Gold, the brand noted that it achieves these levels of resistance and hardness thanks to “improved microstructure,” though it is not evident what exactly this means.

At present, IWC only offers nine models in Armour Gold, which includes three novelties this year (Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 44 with black or white dial; and Portugieser Hand-Wound Tourbillon Day & Night).

This article first appeared on WOW’s Autumn Issue #74

For more on the latest in luxury watch reads from WOW, click here.

The Alchemy of Gold: Watchmaking’s Most Innovative Alloys

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Day-Date in Everose gold with President bracelet

Everose Gold

These are all complicated points and we will be covering them briefly. We bring this point to the fore because fine watchmaking has been in the public eye itself recently for the investment angle. Specifically, some types of watches might qualify as alternative investment assets. To be clear, we have always argued (or at least cautioned) against this but we acknowledge reality and there are many of you, dear readers, who are intrigued by the potential of watches to not only retain value but also to grow it.

Some years ago, before we dared to comment on the phenomenon of investing in watches, we hinted at what a dark world this might herald. It was an Editor’s Note with the catchy title Watches as Currency and watches cased in precious metal are the personification of this idea. If gold, in particular, is a kind of currency, then wearing watches cased in this material will really be like having cash strapped to one’s wrist. Well perhaps just a digital display that indicates how much the watch in question is valued at. A good way to grab the attention of thieves you say? Welcome to the world of those who rock all-gold watches, and Singapore might just be the safest place on earth to do this.

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Day-Date in Everose gold with President bracelet

As a counterpoint, the watch-buying community knows all too well that the best deals available on the secondary market are timepieces cased in precious metals. That means any precious metal, not just gold. To be blunt, these are the types of watches that shed the most value, including examples from the biggest names in Swiss watchmaking. Generally speaking, the why of this is hard to explain, especially versus amped-up valuations on steel watches, but the hypothesis (from specialists, including us) is that the precious metal recommended retail prices have always been too high. This is especially true when any given brand also offers a model in a non-precious metal variant too.

Hublot Square Bang Unico Ceramic Magic Gold

Magic Gold

Hublot flexed its materials science muscle in 2012 with its demonstration of the properties of Magic Gold. While the manufacture was known for its forward-thinking ways prior to this, its fame was tied closely to synthetic materials. Hublot also has a proprietary gold alloy called King Gold, which owes its superior reddish hue to a higher-than-normal mix of copper, but this achievement was dwarfed by the arrival of Magic Gold, a type of metal matrix composite (MMC), which we covered briefly in Summer. Hublot is certainly not the only watch brand experimenting with MMCs but we focus here because Magic Gold is probably the most familiar material for watch cases, and remains a part of the core collection – Cerachrom and Ceragold are a different matter.

When it debuted, Magic Gold promised a golden revolution of sorts because it was meant to be a scratch-resistant gold alloy. It does not take expert knowledge to realise that gold is a relatively soft and dense metal that is prone to scratching – steel is significantly harder but no less of a scratch magnet, as they say in watch collecting circles. Hublot’s mission was to create and deliver a material that would qualify as 18k gold (as most gold watch cases are) that also exhibited a degree of scratch resistance that was all but impossible for a metal alloy. The manufacture decided to add ceramic (either as continuous strands or particulates) to a gold matrix to achieve this end. Nothing like this had been tried before in watchmaking so Hublot turned to the materials science experts at the EPFL in Lausanne. The manufacture has its own research and development facility, but fundamental research is impossible to do in a silo.

The materials specialists began with selecting their raw materials. This included 24k gold, aluminium, and boron carbide – boron carbide is a ceramic and is the third hardest substance known to humans. The proportions used were as follows: 75 percent (gold), three percent (aluminium) and 22 percent (boron carbide). Boron carbide powder is first compacted into a desired shape before being sintered to form a porous solid. Pure molten 24k gold is then forced into these pores under 200 bars of pressure – Hublot once described this as forcing water into a room full of footballs (EuropaStar, 2011). This revealing metaphor indicates that rather than the ceramic being the matrix that holds gold, it is the other way around. This is perfectly in line with Magic Gold being an MMC of course. Needless to say, Magic Gold is harder and more resistant to scratches than traditional gold alloys, while still maintaining the luxurious appearance and properties of gold. How tough is it, exactly? Well, apparently only diamond tools can make a dent in Magic Gold.

To machine Magic Gold, CNC machines equipped with ultrasonic cutters and diamond-tipped tools had to be specially ordered from Germany. Our last update on Magic Gold noted that 28 bezels in Magic Gold took three weeks to machine and that only between 30-40 complete cases could be produced monthly. This is unlikely to have changed as Magic Gold remains truly rare in the Hublot assortment. It is no small thing that this innovation remains in play, and it has had more than 10 years now of testing Magic Gold in the wild. No solution is perfect, and Magic Gold may yet receive an update in the years to come.

Hublot Square Bang Unico Magic Gold

Sedna Gold

Qualified honesty has everything to do with why watch brands with big industrial bases tend to flex materials science credentials with creations that advertise their expertise boldly. While Sedna gold was once associated exclusively with Omega, which introduced it in 2013, it is now a staple part of Blancpain offerings too. Needless to say, both brands are a part of the Swatch Group universe and the presence of Sedna gold at both brands is only one marker of the synergies at play. With this fact in mind, we will acknowledge the material developments with precious metals at Omega but would be remiss in our duties as a specialist commentator if we did not note the great work done at Rado, Tissot and Swatch itself in the area of ceramics, composites and polymers (various plastics).

Hublot Big Bang Integrated Time Only King Gold

All of the above is just proof positive that Swatch Group knows how to do fundamental research into new materials and how to industrialise the same. While in 2016 we wrote that Omega was making waves with its anti-magnetic movements, today we could report that many Swatch Group brands have followed suit. LiquidMetal, a zirconium-based amorphous alloy that gets inlaid into ceramic bezels using a combination of high heat and high pressure, was also deployed by Omega first, but has since been adopted by Blancpain. When it comes to case materials proper, Omega was also first out of the gate with Ceragold in 2012, which was a combination of ceramic and gold, although not quite rising to the level of Magic Gold.

While Ceragold is indeed a niche material for Omega, Sedna gold is anything but. Named after the red planetoid which was once the furthest observed object of that mass in our solar system, the 18k alloy is a proprietary blend of gold, copper and palladium. Like other rose gold alloys, Sedna owes its distinctive colour to its copper content. The palladium content functions to give the colour long-term stability, much as platinum does in other alloys. While Omega has used Sedna gold aggressively, with the material mostly supplanting traditional rose gold in all collections, Blancpain is currently limiting it to just the Fifty Fathoms Bathyscaphe collection.

It would be remiss of us to neglect Omega’s other precious metal alloy efforts in recent years, which range from Canopus gold to perhaps the best-known of all proprietary blends, Moonshine gold. Of course, there the key messaging was handled by Swatch, which actually used it in a version of the MoonSwatch. We say this is the most widely recognised brand-owned gold alloy because Swatch has a huge reach – the Mission to Moonshine watch is probably one of the most popular Swatch models of 2023 – and it never fails to mention that Moonshine is an Omega trademark.

A. Lange & Söhne Datograph Perpetual Tourbillon Honeygold "Lumen"

Honey Gold

Also returning in this updated list is the alloy introduced by A. Lange & Söhne in 2010. It originally appeared in the Homage to F.A. Lange trio of limited edition watches and is known officially as Honeygold; we typically list it as honey gold as a matter of house style. The Glashütte manufacture has been remarkably consistent in keeping the use of honey gold as limited as possible. It was only five years after its auspicious and audacious debut that A. Lange & Söhne decided to roll it out again, this time at Watches and Wonders 2015.

At this Hong Kong precursor to the grand Geneva show, the 1815 200th Anniversary F.A. Lange debuted as a 200-piece limited edition. Subsequently, honey gold has featured in a handful of releases, not all of which are related at all to F. A. Lange. This year, it is the Datograph Perpetual Tourbillon Honeygold Lumen, which features prominently elsewhere this issue. Other key models in this proprietary gold alloy are the Zeitwerk Minute Repeater (last year) and standard Zeitwerk (2021) watches; a second trio of Homage to F.A. Lange watches (2020); and Langematik Perpetual (2019).

Aesthetically, honey gold’s hue falls between its pink and yellow siblings, with a noticeably lower saturation – it is paler, yet redder than yellow gold, and has a marked resemblance to honey (no duh). This alloy’s colour stems from its higher proportions of copper vis-à-vis regular yellow gold, and the addition of zinc; obviously, this is still an 18k alloy so the proportions are in the remaining 25 percent of the alloy that are not gold.

Honey gold was not developed by A. Lange & Sohne with only aesthetics in mind; this was not even the primary reason. Instead, the manufacture was keen on creating a gold alloy that was more scratch-resistant for its cases. With a hardness of 320 Vickers, honey gold has around twice the hardness of standard 18k yellow gold, which lives in the 150 to 160 Vickers range. The result, by all accounts, is a hardier watch case that is less prone to dings and scratches.

Despite its greater hardness, honey gold is not necessarily more difficult to work. Any equipment that is primed to machine steel cases, which are even harder, is more than capable of handling honey gold; A. Lange & Söhne does not make cases anyway. When used in movement components, however, the material does present challenges to the finisseurs. The Homage to F.A. Lange watches have balance cocks executed in honey gold rather than German silver, as is typically the case. Hand-engraving these pieces with the manufacture’s signature floral motif is thus more difficult and time-consuming, while also requiring a special set of burins with harder blades.

IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar; Opposite: IWC Portugieser Hand- Wound Tourbillon Day & Night

Armour Gold

A recent addition to the parade of proprietary gold alloys, Armour Gold is IWC’s first ride into the realm of precious metals but certainly not its first rodeo in the material innovation circuit. Like many of the watch brands featured here, IWC is known for playing with materials, including being the first top-tier brand to use ceramic for its cases. This became an IWC specialty in some ways, with observers always looking forward to hardy yet aesthetically pleasing materials from the brand’s new releases. In this way, Armour Gold is very much playing to established strengths in IWC’s watches-for-professionals game.

In our chat with the professionals at IWC in Geneva, we got into the substance of Armour Gold, in passing. The gist of it had to do with functional relevance, even when the matter of aesthetics was weightier. So, yes, Armour Gold does purport to live up to its name; in fact, every alloy on this list has some degree of functional distinctiveness, though we did not perform any tests ourselves. IWC introduced its proprietary gold rather quietly, back in 2019; a number of journalists were surprised that Armour Gold was not new for this year.

For IWC, the pertinent qualities of Armour Gold are its resistance to wear and we know the manufacture would not have bothered if it was just to have a different colour. When the material was introduced with the Big Pilot’s Watch Constant-Force Tourbillon Edition Le Petit Prince, the brand noted that it was its first experiment with so-called hard gold. This kind of gold is approximately five to 10 times more wear-resistant than standard red gold. By wear-resistant, we understand this to mean that the material resists scratches better than regular gold alloys. In another press release for a watch that used Armour Gold, the brand noted that it achieves these levels of resistance and hardness thanks to “improved microstructure,” though it is not evident what exactly this means.

At present, IWC only offers nine models in Armour Gold, which includes three novelties this year (Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 44 with black or white dial; and Portugieser Hand-Wound Tourbillon Day & Night).

For more on the latest in luxury watch reads from WOW, click here.

The New Blancpain Villeret Quantième Perpétuel

Blancpain’s new perpetual calendar timepiece is, perhaps, the perfect microcosm of these efforts. If you happen to own a perpetual calendar, you just had the rare pleasure of watching the date switch from February 29th to March 1st because this year just so happens to be a leap year. In the digital age, such timekeeping idiosyncrasies are trivial but it took some effort to get here. By some, of course we mean a whole lot! Thus, although this story celebrates the new Blancpain Villeret Quantième Perpétuel (which is simply an archaic French term for perpetual calendar), we must set the stage properly for its grand entrance. The mechanical perpetual calendar is, after all, the very summit of what watchmakers have achieved over the course of millennia. Actually, given that digital timekeeping and even the atomic clock are merely the latest and most accurate technical measurements of time that humanity can manage, we posit here that any future measurement technique should be considered a descendant of the humble sundial.

Following on from this, we can say that horology’s key pursuit is timekeeping – to accurately measure and display the time. You may be surprised to hear that even the top executives at watch brands, including Marc A. Hayek over at Blancpain, always tell us that they are in the business of pursuing excellence in chronometry. While this seems straightforward, it is anything but. Instead, timekeeping is perhaps better approached as a multifaceted discipline that requires control over various interrelated factors; chronometry is a big word that encompasses many aspects of watchmaking.

A key challenge lies in the wildly varying scale of things. At one end, time is measured in the fractions of a second, as the balance wheel’s oscillations metre out the watchmaker's desired interval with its tick-tock rhythm. This precisely regulated subdivision accumulates to count the passing seconds and, in turn, the minutes and hours. The name of the game here is regularity. It informs every aspect of timekeeping at this scale, such as the balance wheel and hairspring’s isochronism, which counteracts the unwinding mainspring’s decreasing torque, as well as the devices’ resistance to temperature and positional changes for improved precision.


”Long renowned for its calendar watches, Blancpain has deep expertise in this segment, extending even to the esoteric Chinese calendar”

In contrast, timekeeping at the largest scales – at least within the context of horology – involves patterns and events spanning months, years, and even centuries, most of them astronomical in nature. Predictable regularity falls away here as bewildering complexity takes its place, held together by myriad rules and exceptions.

Before we hurtle forward and dive deep, it should be noted that this is the second issue in a row that we are looking at calendar mechanisms. Regular readers should therefore expect a bit of a rethread here of the nuts and bolts of the calendar. In other words, here comes another lesson in science and history. As always with our cover stories, if you want to discover the particularities of the Blancpain Villeret Quantième Perpétuel, that bit is actually reserved for the Cover Watch section in the front of the book. That, for example, is where the specifications are. And now, with housekeeping matters and rules of engagement cleared up, on with the show!

Balance and Compromise

Here is the crux of the issue: horology at larger time scales is not just about marking the passage of time. Rather, it must balance society’s need for consistency and convenience with natural phenomena that are rarely so, if ever. Throw historical and cultural influences into the mix, and the watchmaker’s task to bridge these differences becomes clear.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the perpetual calendar. Before diving into the complexity (and limitations) of this high complication, however, it is necessary to first understand the modern Gregorian calendar that it tracks, as well as the Julian calendar it was based on.

Proposed by Julius Caesar in 46 BCE, the Julian calendar was adopted by the Roman Empire on 1 January 45 BCE, and remained the de facto calendar in the western world for the next 16 centuries. Unlike the lunisolar Roman calendar it replaced, which incorporated both the solar and lunar cycles, the Julian calendar was a solar calendar that was solely based on the earth’s revolution around the sun. Well, it was a geocentric world at that time but you get the idea.

The Julian calendar introduced two crucial changes that remain in place today. The first is the number of days in each month – a curious sequence that sees the consecutive months of July and August having 31 days each, while leaving February with just 28. The reasons for this were complex, and boiled down to a mixture of historical, political, and religious considerations.

Related to the above is the second change: the practice of adding an extra day – the leap day – to February on every leap year. By the advent of the Julian calendar, astronomers had already known for around a century that the solar year was just under 365.25 days. A regular year of 365 days was thus some six hours “short”, which meant that the calendar would accumulate this error and deviate by around a day every four years. The Julian calendar accounted for the shortfall by designating a leap year every four years, when a day was added in February to help the system “catch up”. This mechanism removed the need for manual corrections, which also helped prevent abuse by pontifices who could, under the Roman calendar, lengthen a year to benefit themselves or their allies.

For all intents and purposes, the Julian calendar was accurate enough, hence its continual use for more than 1,600 years. Still, its definition of 365.25 days for a year was an approximation that was not quite right. As it turned out, the solar year’s actual length is 365.2422 days – neither elegant nor convenient, but still reality nonetheless. Consequently, the Julian calendar’s solar year was a tad too long, and the error was accumulating over time. In particular, this affected the observation of Easter; the religious festival's date was based in part on the March equinox, which was gradually drifting from observed reality.

Things finally came to a head in 1582 with the Gregorian reform, which saw Pope Gregory XIII replacing the Julian calendar with the Gregorian calendar – the system we still use today. The single biggest improvement introduced by the Gregorian calendar was its spacing of the leap years. Rather than designating every fourth year as a leap year, a more complex set of rules was implemented to reduce the Julian calendar’s error.

Under the Gregorian calendar, years that are divisible by 4 are designated as leap years unless they are also divisible by 100, in which case they are regular years. The exception to this exception is if a year is also divisible by 400 – if so, then it is a leap year. 1800 and 1900 were thus regular years, while 2000 was a leap year. Looking forward, 2100, 2200, and 2300 are all regular years, and 2400 will be a leap year.

The Gregorian year’s tweaked algorithm offers an upgrade to the Julian calendar by averaging the solar year to 365.2425 days instead, which reduces the error to a nearly imperceptible 26 seconds a year. For civil use, it is essentially perfect.

Counting The Days

Where does this lengthy preamble leave us? Hopefully, with a better appreciation of how the modern calendar and its quirks came to be, as well as a glimpse at the challenges of engineering a device that can keep track of these peculiarities. But let us not get ahead of ourselves, and build our perpetual calendar up from the basics.

From a reductionist perspective, a calendar complication is simply a set of wheels and levers that advance its display(s) once a day at midnight to show the new date and, occasionally, other information such as the day of the week. Indeed, the simple calendar does exactly this with a 31-day date wheel. As its name suggests, however, the complication is fairly simple, and does not account for the differing lengths of the months. So, it requires a manual correction at the end of every February, April, June, September, and October, in order to advance the date from the 30th to the 1st of the following month.

The upgrade to this is the annual calendar, a complication that is so named because it only requires a correction once a year, at the end of every February. The annual calendar is built in different ways by different manufactures. The underlying principle is the same though: by adding a series of components, including a wheel with five longer teeth or a disk with five deeper notches, a mechanical computer that more closely models the same five months is created. The computer's “input” here varies according to the length of the teeth or the depth of the notches, which engage differently with the fingers and gears they are connected with. As for the “output”? It is the crucial difference between advancing the date wheel by a single day, such as on the end of 31st August, versus a double jump that goes from the 30th in a “short” month to the 1st of the next.

Alas, February’s varying length is beyond the capabilities of the annual calendar’s mechanical computer. The next step up is the perpetual calendar, which goes further by accounting for February’s uneven number of days. Unsurprising, its complexity qualifies it as a high complication and a hallmark of haute horlogerie.

Like the annual calendar, the perpetual calendar functions like a mechanical computer, and can be realised in different ways. The very first one is attributed to English watchmaker Thomas Mudge, whose 1762 pocket watch is the first known example of this complication in any kind of timepiece. You can see it for yourself at the famed British Museum in London, as the editor has. The basic design of the perpetual calendar is evident in this very watch, which can be neatly summarised for most contemporary watches that follow the most traditional approach. Perpetual calendar mechanisms are built around the grand lever, which is an outsized, multi-pronged lever that “reads” the programmed “inputs” and translates them to “outputs” by advancing the date wheel.

There are variations on this theme, of course. The month wheel may have 12 notches, for instance, and rely on a separate wheel – or Maltese Cross-shaped component – to track the leap year. Alternatively, it may just have 48 notches instead, each corresponding to a month in the same 4-year cycle. This, as noted above, covers just the classic iterations of the complication; other mechanical designs for the perpetual calendar exist and we may come back to this complication in a more in-depth style later this year.

Whatever its design, the perpetual calendar represents a significantly bigger jump in technical complexity compared with the full calendar and even the annual calendar (although that complication as much newer but we digress). As you may recall, the Gregorian calendar excludes three leap years in every 400-year cycle, with the next ones being 2100, 2200, and 2300. Assuming that a perpetual calendar timepiece is kept running and requires no maintenance – one can dream – it will only need three adjustments every 400 years.

Mechanical considerations aside, how the various pieces of information are displayed on the dial is another challenge. Legibility and aesthetics are, after all, determined by the arrangement of components and displays, which is influenced to some extent by movement architecture, but also by design choices. The last major piece of the puzzle concerns wearability. Since the typical perpetual calendar is built as a module that is then stacked atop a base movement (the module is literally mounted dial-side, just as all conventional calendar indications are), finesse is necessary, lest an overly thick movement is created to yield a timepiece that is unwieldy on the wrist.


”Note how the main dial’s sunray finish serves as a background against which the snailed sub- dials sit – with the latter rendered in two layers”

A Verdant Touch

Long renowned for its calendar watches, Blancpain has developed a deep expertise in this segment that extends to even the esoteric Chinese calendar. Perpetual calendars, in particular, are well-loved staples within the brand’s line-up. Among them, the Villeret Quantième Perpétuel stands out and has existed in its current form since 2018, although the perpetual calendar has been making the rounds for the brand for years before that. Elegant, functional, and perfectly proportioned, the Villeret Quantième Perpétuel offers a masterclass in the execution of the high complication, from technical elements to design considerations and more.

This year, the Villeret model (no other Blancpain collection features a perpetual calendar) welcomes a new reference in red gold and, for the first time, a green dial. Inspired by the fir trees lining Blancpain’s native village of Villeret <there is an entire story about Villeret and La Brassus that we do not have the time to get into here but you can get a sense of this history – and the brand’s fascinating story – in our Spring cover story last on the Fifty Fathoms – Ed>, the new colourway does not just freshen things up by offering an alternative to the current references with white or blue dials. Instead, it also proposes a more contemporary style of refinement that connoisseurs will surely appreciate.

At first glance, what is immediately striking is the dial’s symmetric layout. Here, the various counters are spaced comfortably across the dial, with the respective displays presenting information according to their relative importance. To that end, the display of time is reserved for the three feuille hands sweeping across the dial. Meanwhile, the current day and date are each tracked on corresponding sub-dials – at nine and three o’clock. As for the less frequently used month and leap year indicators? These displays have been relegated to 12 o’clock, where they share a single counter that, nonetheless, offers at-a-glance legibility.

Familiar Phases

If the perpetual calendar tracks the date of the Gregorian calendar based on the earth's orbit around the sun, then surely its counterpart – the moon, our closest celestial companion – deserves a place on the watch dial as well. Indeed, the moon phase display is an oft-included complication on timepieces with perpetual calendars, and it sits here at six o’clock.

A discussion of the lunar cycle is well beyond the scope of this story. Suffice it to say, however, that like Earth's orbit around the sun, it is an unruly phenomenon that defies simple calculations, as the synodic lunar month is 29.530588 mean solar days long. So, the same game of approximation is played here: to display the phases of the moon on a watch, the lunar month is typically coded mechanically using a 59-tooth wheel to represent two lunar cycles. Advancing the wheel by one tooth daily creates a lunar month that is 29.5-days long, which is just 44 minutes and 2.9 seconds short of the actual lunar cycle. This deviation accumulates to an error of one day every 2.5 years and, by extension, a correction in just as long.

For Blancpain, this complication is especially dear. The reasons are historical: when modern Blancpain reemerged in the early 1980s, towards the end of the Quartz Crisis, the moon phase display was arguably its anchoring complication. Swiss brands had, until then, largely attempted to compete with quartz movements on price, by stripping away complications and simplifying their mechanical calibres. This strategy was, in hindsight, largely ineffectual.

Blancpain, on the other hand, took a contrarian approach by leaning into the complexities of mechanical watchmaking, and released its first watch with a moon phase display in 1983. The timepiece’s debut was a watershed moment; the complication harked back to the rich legacy of mechanical timekeeping, and showcased a romantic side of traditional watchmaking absent in quartz timepieces. This particular watch did more than just galvanise the wider Swiss watch industry. Rather, it also established the complete calendar (i.e. a simple calendar that shows the day, date, and month) with moon phase as a Blancpain signature, and introduced the manufacturer’s “man in the moon” design that remains in use today.


”Blancpain’s under-lug calendar correctors are invisible when the watch is worn, which also creates a more harmonious case”

Aesthetic Appeal

Despite needing to display multiple pieces of information from the perpetual calendar and moon phase, the Villeret Quantième Perpétuel is still eminently legible. Part of the credit should go to the movement designers, of course. Readability is also subtly enhanced with contrasting textures on the dial, which creates varied surfaces that light plays across differently. Note, for instance, how the main dial’s sunray finish serves as a background against which the snailed sub-dials sit – with the latter rendered in two layers, no less.

Other details abound if one knows where to look. Consider the design of the three central hands and how they are mounted to the cannon pinion. Eagle-eyed observers will note how they form a stepped pattern of concentric circles right at the centre of the dial – an attractive yet subtle touch that mirrors and complements the stepped bezel emerging from the case. In much the same way, the hands and appliqué indices have all been rendered in polished red gold to speak a uniform visual language.

High Calibre

The heart of every watch is its movement, and the one powering the Villeret Quantième Perpétuel is Blancpain’s self-winding Calibre 5954. Some of its technical features have already been discussed above, from its organisation of information on the dial to its inclusion of the moon phase display.

What is also important are the movement’s dimensions. At just 4.97mm high, Calibre 5954 can be considered an ultra-thin perpetual calendar movement. This feature translates to an equally svelte case, which enables the Villeret Quantième Perpétuel to clock in at just 10.80mm high – slim enough to slip under a shirt cuff effortlessly. Despite its diminutive dimensions, Calibre 5954 still manages to have a full-size rotor for greater efficiency when winding its barrel and has a longish 72-hour power reserve. A temperature- and shock-resistant silicon hairspring is par for the course here, naturally.

What is also of note here is how the watch’s indicators are adjusted. The usual implementation involves positioning recessed pushers around the case – to adjust a particular display, one simply uses a stylus or any similar tool to actuate its corresponding quick-set pusher. This presents two problems though. For one, making corrections is inconvenient as a tool must be on hand. The second issue concerns aesthetics: the pushers on the case interrupt its visual continuity.

Blancpain overcame this issue with an ingenious solution – under-lug correctors that can simply be actuated using one’s fingers, not unlike a chronograph pusher. These correctors are invisible when the watch is worn, which also creates a more harmonious case. Convenience and design aside, it is also worth noting that the correctors are blocked when the indicators are changing, which prevents the wearer from accidentally damaging the movement. Fans of the Blancpain system will recall it has been in action for almost 20 years now.

The overall result here is a timepiece that is complex under the dial, but easy to read and operate. Perhaps what makes things even more poetic is the fact that 2024, its year of release, is a leap year. What better way is there to mark the occasion, than with a new perpetual calendar?

This article first appeared on WOW’s Spring 2024 issue.

For more on the latest in watch reads, click here.