The Festive issue of WOW Singapore is back with the most appropriate cover theme, featuring the Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda PF Xiali Calendar. This is perhaps the best watch to bridge the festive traditions of east and west, sandwiched as we are between Christmas and Chinese New Year.
TAG Heuer Monaco Chronograph
The editors of Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand gathered around a metaphorical fireplace and regaled each other with tales of their 2023 watch acquisitions. They were joined by a special guest, the Men’s Folio Singapore Editor, in what is now an annual crossover tradition for WOW. This very personal celebration of new timepieces is complemented by a visual presentation of curated watches you could get for yourself in one of WOW’s trademark celebratory spreads.
Grand Prix d’Horlogerie Geneve in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Between the remaining highlights of the year and our own lists, the editors get down to brass tacks in a frank discussion about how to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak. The answer might lie in the stories we tell ourselves about our favourites, or it might be in the accolades they earn, including the at recently concluded Grand Prix d’Horlogerie Geneve. The timepiece awards show is covered extensively as a result of a collaboration between the Singapore and Malaysia editions.
CEO of Bulgari, Jean-Christophe Babin
Finally, the editors hold court with some of the most important personalities in the trade, including the legendary CEO of Bulgari, Jean-Christophe Babin (a WOW exclusive). Roger Dubuis marketing wizard Sadry Keiser speaks truth to power while Bell & Ross Managing Director Fabien Nonancourt explains how every millimetre counts when it comes to case shapes and sizes.
Bell & Ross Managing Director Fabien Nonancourt
The Festive issue of WOW Singapore is out now, on digital and physical newsstands.
For more on the latest in luxury watch reads, click here.
A. Lange & Söhne Product Development Director Anthony de Haas Speaks on the First Automatic Chronograph
Without giving too much away, we can say that Anthony de Haas is one of our favourite interview subjects. Not only is he a charismatic personality and, consequently, always a great interview, he is also disarmingly honest about his work and A. Lange & Söhne in general. This is not to say that other spokespeople such as Wilhelm Schmid and Tino Bobe are less forthcoming, but de Haas just has a certain vibe. Or it might be all down to de Haas being Dutch.
Now, de Haas is hardly a stranger to us, and to you, being one of only three people who speak on the record for A. Lange & Söhne (all of whom have obliged us with face- time in the last five years or so). As such, you could be forgiven for thinking we would have little to discuss with de Haas. Nothing could be further from the truth though because this watchmaking legend is a popular and much sought-after interview subject. The reason – there are many but this one works as an indicative illustration – is that de Haas gives great quotes and is a hurricane of information. Getting swept away by a deluge of information is a real possibility every time one engages de Haas.
On the occasion of this latest meeting, WOW Thailand editor Ruckdee Chotjinda is with us because we are visiting the A. Lange & Söhne manufacture in Glashütte. The conversation happened in a nondescript conference room with journalists from our region; also present are representatives from Robb Report Malaysia and QP Thailand. For the most part, the questions and answers presented here are from Ruckdee and this writer, although interjections did occur but have been excluded for the sake of brevity. The second question, on double-assembly, came from the Robb Report journalist.
On that note, de Haas’ first answer is presented largely unedited, just so you can see how garrulous he can be, even when confronted with the simplest of questions (mine, as it happens, which is unusual for me). Both the question and the answer have been edited for clarity, language, and even length, but are otherwise unaltered. In case you are wondering, de Haas’ answer unfolded over 10 mins, which took up all of my time for the interview, but he graciously carried on for well over the time the group was originally assigned. We honestly have enough material for quite a personal piece on de Haas, but unfortunately, neither time nor space is on our side. No doubt we will get the chance again!
Congratulations again on the Odysseus Chronograph, which Tino Bobe showed us at Watches and Wonders Geneva this year. Everyone wants to know why you made this as a limited edition, and only a limited edition, which is a first for A. Lange & Söhne...
Yeah, now we thought it's a very, very, very complicated chronograph (so) frankly, we said, you know what, let's start with a limited edition in (steel), and then we'll see. Let us first deliver these hundred pieces, then we'll see. Making the world mad with (a claim that) “it's available everywhere...” when we know that we struggle a little bit (with production)...we have long waiting lists for the steel Odysseus, the standard one. And we have titanium and white gold (versions of the standard time-only Odysseus); we were really overwhelmed by the success...by the demand for the Odysseus.
When we launched the watch in October, 2019 it was very polarizing and that was good. But by December already we had to have a production meeting because, you know, we don't make dials, we're not dial makers; the bracelets, we don't make (this) in house. So, we had to order extra pieces (of everything that we required suppliers for) and we did. Then we all went into (COVID-19) lockdown and all those things got delayed and we never were able to catch up with the backlog...
On the watchmaking (movement) side, in-house, we had another problem, and maybe it is also because we were caught off-guard (about the demand for the Odysseus): the watchmakers who work on the calibre (L155.1) are the same ones who work on the Lange 1 (calibre L121.1). It is the same level of qualification needed to make either, so now we have a problem because is the Odysseus more important than the Lange 1? No! So, poor Tino and his team (have to manage this)...you can’t say to a watchmaker this week you make Odysseus and the week after you work on the Lange 1. It doesn’t work like that; for a watchmaker, it is annoying [de Haas himself is a trained watchmaker – Ed] but we are actually about to do (something like this).
On the other hand, there is also planning – I have planning and development (under me) and you could (suggest) that I postpone development but that messes up my whole programme. We have (for example, another complication planned for the Odysseus) and this takes between two to three years. If I postpone this, then something else gets delayed, and it all starts to eat into the life cycle of the collections (so there are a lot of wheels turning and there is a lot at stake).
At the moment (returning to the matter of the Odysseus Chronograph), we have two watchmakers in training to make the calibre L156.1 [this is the Odysseus Chronograph calibre – Ed]. I say they are in training but they are not absolute beginners – they were previously working on the Triple Split. But the Odysseus Chronograph is so different to all the chronographs we have made before. I mean, yes there is a vertical clutch here but, as a watchmaker, when I hear ‘vertical clutch’ I think of something made industrially. We wanted to make something completely different, and that is the challenge we gave ourselves. (The two new guys) are excited to be working on the Odysseus Chronograph and if they start in November, maybe the first pieces will be delivered by (early 2024).
Do not also underestimate complexity. For something like the zero-reset (function of the Langematik Perpetual and 1815 Tourbillon)...I get questions about why we do not have a zero-reset across the collections because it is so genius... We could do it, in the regular Lange 1 for example, but then the price of the watch would explode...it would be EU10,000 more expensive (or more) because the zero-reset is almost like a chronograph mechanism itself. You have more parts, and so you need more space.
So (back to the Odysseus Chronograph), because it is so different and so challenging for us, we make a lot of laboratory tests for it. We test the start-stop chronograph action 50,000 times, and then another 50,000 times after letting the chronograph run 10 minutes (all of which is done by a machine, there is no person who is sitting there to start and stop and restart the chronograph). We are German here, and we would like a little German quality control! This is why we said just 100 pieces, although – on the first day of Watches and Wonders Geneva – our sales guys asked why we do not make 250 pieces. We know that there are maybe 500 people we could sell the Odysseus Chronograph to [and probably much more than this – Ed] but (again, because of the complexity of doing something so challenging for the first time) we said let us first make and deliver these 100 pieces. How fast – relatively – we can even make these watches is something we don’t know. We do not know if we could make one watch in one year, or two years... Selling the watches is one thing, making them is another thing.
Developing (something like the Odysseus Chronograph), that is what you [meaning journalists and collectors – Ed] will never see because we are making something completely new. Maybe, these two watchmakers who will work on the Odysseus Chronograph will say “Oh, this is easy; I can do one a month,” but we just don’t know before we start. We need a reliable plan that tells us how much time we need to actually deliver. Look (bottom line), we are not playing games here...it is not like we have 50 ready already, but we’re waiting a little bit because it is interesting...
Sorry, this is a very long answer to a relatively short question, but I’m bad at short answers.
Tell us more about double-assembly, which is a signature at A. Lange & Söhne.
You know, second assembly is, in the world of complications, a very common thing. I used to work at Audemars Piguet in Switzerland [close to 20 years ago now because de Haas celebrates his 20th anniversary at A. Lange & Sohne in 2024 – Ed]. We did the same thing. In the process of the first assembly, you might get oil all over the movement, and you don’t want to sell something in that state. So you take it apart and clean it; that is what we do here too. The special thing we have at A. Lange & Sohne is German silver and this material is a bit sensitive. If you touch it, it will oxidise – but of course no watchmaker will ever touch any component with (bare) fingers. Never, whether here or Patek Philippe or Seiko [component manufacturing is another matter though, no matter where you go, and contact with bare skin might happen – Ed].
So, you did not see our CNC machines because it is all the same stuff as they have in Switzerland, and you have probably seen more manufacturers than me. But there is one machine we have that no one else has, and if I were to give the (A. Lange & Söhne) tour that would be the only machine I would show. It is a washing machine for the German silver parts. We developed this with the technical university here in Dresden. So when, for example, you make a base plate or a gear train bridge, the machine does first one side and then the other. In between, the parts all go into the specially made washing machine. That, to me, is really interesting (and different here at A. Lange & Söhne).
Double-assembly (where we do a first assembly of every calibre and then take them all apart and do everything again) has been standard at A. Lange & Söhne since the start. It is just how we work. Now, we tried to do just single assembly, with the Saxonia, once and it was a disaster. You think we would save time but we didn’t; we wasted time!
On that note, A. Lange & Sohne does not do everything in-house, so how do you decide what things you will do?
We do not make dials and cases (as mentioned earlier), but there are exceptions. We do make our own enamel dials, which was a huge project for us and we even got support from Vacheron Constantin when we encountered issues. You know, in Glashütte, there are maybe eight or nine watchmaking brands, and zero dialmakers. This means a dialmaker won’t have enough business here to survive. Can you now imagine the kind of investment it takes to start and run a dialmaker? It is not something we want to touch, generally.
Similarly, we make some complicated cases ourselves, but the rest we leave to the great casemakers that we have in (Richemont) over in Switzerland. You may have heard that we do not make our own screws, and it’s true. We know how to make them, and we do make these parts for prototypes. We send the specifications to specialists who have 40 times the number of machines that we have (or can have). It makes sense for such a specialist to produce these components.
On the other hand, you know we make hair springs, and this we want to do. Sure we have the capacity to produce for others, and we do, but I prefer to experiment with that capacity. You know the remontoir system we use in the Zeitwerk? There is a second hairspring there, and you must know we never would have found this solution... even had the idea of a remontoir system in the Zeitwerk, if we didn’t have hairspring manufacturing capacity.
This article first appeared on WOW's Legacy 2024 issue.
For more on the latest in luxury watch reads, click here.
Here's Why Breguet is the "Bold Type"
From Top: Breguet Type XX reference 2067 and Type 20 reference 2057
The phrase time flies has something to do with the speed with which time passes. Typically, this is only used when discussing how quickly time seems to pass when we are engaged in something fun. It is, to use the most relevant example, what magazine editors hope happens as you traipse across our pages. Happily, it is also relevant to the opening salvo of this potentially rambling missive. Ambling about in the Petit Palais in Paris, wine glass in hand while waiting for dinner to begin, I cannot help but consider how fast everything seems to be drawing to a close. Breguet has brought us all (that includes my co- pilot for this story, Ruckdee Chotjinda) to Paris for its first proper international launch in years, and certainly the first in the after-times. It has been a pastis-fuelled affair that has taken us across the city and its aerospace museum – for once, the museum visit here is not incidental but an integral part of the celebration...
We will come back to that museum, the Musée de l’air et de l’espace, briefly, but first I must return us to our narrative. We are assembled at the Petit Palais (the Grand Palais was under renovation during the launch in June and will be till next year) for the official launch of the Breguet Type 20 and Type XX, more specifically references 2057 and 2067, which happens to be one of the most significant chronograph-specific launches this year. As we mentioned in our Autumn issue, the watchmaking world is deep in the throes of a passionate love affair with the chronograph, and Breguet is hardly missing in action.
Having said that, this article warrants quite the introduction because Breguet has very specific reasons to celebrate the time-writer in 2023 and that has to do with accidents of history. Specifically, there is one connection in particular that is so fantastic that it could hardly be expected, yet it is a fact. More on that in a moment because there is a lot unpack here. Not for nothing, Breguet also has cause to celebrate because the two new references are really contemporary gems rather than tributes to the past. That alone would have warranted an extensive story such as this one.
Breguet 19 bomber and reconnaissance aircraft from 1922
As usual, this story will include the relevant history of Breguet, as far as it relates to the two new watches. History is of paramount importance in any issue that dares to label itself ‘Legacy’ after all. First though, this introduction concerns itself with several unique problems as far as the Breguet Type 20 is concerned... or is that the Type XX? As you can see, the first issue to resolve is the naming convention, for which we will rely on the official convention at Breguet, as noted on its website. The collection is called Type XX, although there was originally just one model called the Type 20, but that was a so-called mil-spec watch, made exclusively for the French Air Force. Confusingly, this model was known as both Type XX and Type 20 until 1955...
While that does settle things somewhat, you may be wondering what is going on here, especially if you are looking at Breguet with fresh eyes. And rightly so, but you will have to bear with us because the answer lies in the peculiar history of this most significant of chronographs. It is precisely that significance that is most problematic because of the power of the brand that is Breguet, and the legend that is its founder Abraham- Louis Breguet. This is the second year that Breguet has the cover of our Legacy issue, and it is quite possibly the brand most worthy of the legacy moniker. And yet, as we noted in our chronograph special last issue, that vaunted complication is not closely linked with either Breguet or its founder. We will eschew listing Abraham-Louis’ many accomplishments, but suffice to say that his spirit lives on in every watch with Breguet numerals, Breguet hands and, yes, every watch ever made that is endowed with a tourbillon. Not just every Breguet watch, but every watch.
The chronograph has an interesting story that is Abraham-Louis adjacent, shall we say, but that is neither here nor there. Yet, neither he nor his brand is responsible for it, nor the flyback function that defines an aviator’s watch such as the Type XX. Instead, it is a confluence of passions – for watchmaking and powered flight – that resulted in the collection we are examining. In fact, this collection is the tale of two Breguets, with one being the watchmaking brand we are all familiar with. The other one was called Breguet Aviation, and still exists today, as part of Dassault Aviation; Breguet Aviation was founded by Louis-Charles Breguet, the great-great-grandson of Abraham-Louis. This is extremely fitting, given that there are also two sides to Abraham-Louis – he was both a French watchmaker and a native of Neuchatel, who is today largely claimed by the Swiss while the brand that bears his name straddles both cultures. And on that note, let the history of the Type XX unfold...
Historical Landmarks
What did the French Air Force, the Aéronavale, otherwise known as the airborne wing of the French Navy, the French national airline Air France, the makers of the supersonic aircraft Concorde, and the Presidency of the French Republic have in common? If you are cheeky, you might say they are all French, except Concorde which was Anglo-French. Not to worry if this is you because we have you covered. What links all these entities is something they all bought: on-board chronographs and/ or chronograph wristwatches from the Breguet watch company, or they did before the advances of electronic instruments. In the case of the Elysees Palace, the purchases were intended as official gifts, not for technical use, but it is worth mentioning all the same.
The first notable aviator known to own a Breguet Type 20 was the pioneering test pilot Jacqueline Auriol
The above speaks to Breguet’s intrinsic French character, but also to its aviation chops. To the contemporary world, Breguet may not be known as a producer of pilot watches or aviation-related instruments. This is unsurprising because the brand leans into its classical watchmaking roots, which, given the aforementioned legendary status of Abraham-Louis, is only logical. Hence, most watch enthusiasts are more familiar with the Tradition, Classique and Reine de Naples collections; Breguet even tells us that the Reine de Naples is a best-seller, which exposes our masculine biases and tells us that we need to pay closer attention. Anyway, these discreet yet characteristic timepieces are often seen gracing the wrists of collectors and socialites worldwide.
Breguet was, in fact, associated with the grittier and riskier world of aviation from its pioneering decades up until the 1980s. The firm’s famously detailed historical records show that their watches were sold to pilots of various backgrounds between the 1910s and 1920s, including one Alberto Santos-Dumont. Products with properties to withstand harsh conditions associated with the earlier days of flying and those with aviation-specific functionalities, such as the chronograph for essential in-flight timings, were subsequently introduced in the 1930s. From the 1910s onwards, this is where Breguet Aviation, known properly as Société d’Aviation Louis Breguet, comes into it.
Charles-Louis Breguet was active in the development of aircraft and helicopters during the two world wars and the ensuing decade. We saw real examples of his work at the aforementioned museum, and you can too, if you are so inclined. For the Breguet watch company, run from 1870 by former employee, Edward Brown and subsequently by his heirs, the very first chronograph wristwatches for pilots were documented in their sales records in April 1953 – the first watches sold that might have been used by aviators is another matter that requires more pages than we can spare.
The Type 20 in particular was designed to the specifications issued by the nascent French air force in the early 1950s. Said watch had to have a "black dial with luminescent numerals, luminescent hands, a high- quality movement resistant to changes in pressure and acceleration, a rotating bezel, and of course a “flyback” function..." according to the contemporary Breguet firm. This is confirmed by various other watch specialty titles, especially those that get into the Type XX aviator’s watch, but more on that below.
The resulting Breguet watch, in prototype form, was delivered to the Service Technique Aeronautique in 1952, and approved by the same in 1953. The production watch was referred to as Type 20 most of the time, but also Type XX on occasion; the ministry in charge of aviation (named the Ministry of Air, it is now defunct) actually named the watch the Type XX, when it issued the aforementioned specifications for it. Interestingly, the story of the Type XX is not limited to Breguet, with a number of storied names including Auricoste, Dodane, Matthey-Tissot and Vixa also supplying the French armed forces with watches of this type (no pun intended). The first notable aviator known to own a Breguet Type 20 was the pioneering test pilot Jacqueline Auriol – Charles-Louis Breguet presented this watch to Auriol himself.
Breguet appears to have led the pack, given the timing of the first prototypes as well as the first production models. Returning to the Type XX as made by Breguet, the firm reports that the naming irregularity between Type 20 and Type XX continued for a couple of years before a system was formally established in 1955, when watches being supplied to the Air Force would be marked with Arabic numerals and the ones for civilian customers would be marked with Roman numerals. Some 1,100 pieces were made, possibly making the Type XX the first serially produced chronograph for Breguet.
Incremental design improvements were introduced over time, with the chronograph minute counter being enlarged for extra legibility, or the additional 12-hour counter appearing at 6 o’clock on the civilian Type XX, for example. All of these watches produced until 1970 are classified as the first generation for the purpose of historical grouping. This also marked the end of the Brown family’s stewardship of the Breguet watchmaking firm and the start of the Chaumet family’s ownership of Breguet. The brothers moved the firm’s production to the Vallée du Joux later, and Swiss watchmaker Daniel Roth famously made his mark there.
The second generation Type XX ran from 1971 to 1986 during part of this era. However, the line went into hiatus for nine years, before returning as the third generation in 1995, now powered by Nouvelle Lemania movements. This was the era of Investcorp ownership of Breguet, and the private equity group had acquired the Lemania firm in 1992 to make the engines of Breguet watches. The Type XX watches of this time were called the Aéronavale 3800 and Transatlantique 3820 – they were versions without and with the date, respectively. Compared with the earlier generation, these new watches of the 1990s introduced major changes which included the use of a self-winding movement instead of a hand-winding one, and the Breguet signature fluting on the caseband. We believe many of our dear readers had an experience or at least an encounter with the third generation Type XX before it was overshadowed by the popularity of other Breguet collections.
One might think that Breguet has forsaken this utilitarian or sportive line of watches. This is not true. In 1999, Swatch Group took over from Investcorp and Breguet became the crown jewel of the late Nicholas G. Hayek. Hayek was amongst the leading lights of contemporary watchmaking, and set Breguet down the path of advancing traditional watchmaking, just as Abraham-Louis did. Though Breguet began, in this period, to reinforce its links with its founder (witness the Reine de Naples and Tradition, two collections inextricably tied to the image of the brand in the 21st century) but it did not simply ignore the Type XX. Indeed, this era saw the introduction of proper successors to the collection, with the debut of the Type XXI Reference 3810 and Type XXII Reference 3880. The later watch in particular is still cited widely for its maddening 10Hz escapement, which dazzled us at BaselWorld in 2010. While these watches now clearly belong to their own era, the Type XX collection moved into its current size of 42mm at this time.
Things have been a bit quiet since these developments but Breguet has hardly been idle; the watchmakers spent at least the last four years developing the fourth generation Type XX that launched in June this year.
Return To Form
Breguet made chronograph history with the launch of the Type 20 Chronographe 2057 and Type XX Chronographe 2067 in Paris recently. Let us reassure you that there really are two very different watches here; of course you could rely on just your eyes here but there are key details to consider, such as the bezel for one, which we will get to. A quick check on the Breguet website will show you that only the two most recent references remain in the collection. All chronograph lovers will also need to keep the price in mind because it is so significant that we are bringing it all the way forward in the narrative. Breguet says both references retail for USD 18,000 or USD 26,000, which makes this one of the best value propositions in prestige in-house Swiss Made chronographs in steel.
Breguet does not offer many chronographs, and the new Type XX models compare very favourably against the Marine 5527 (USD 36,000 in titanium), which uses a different movement besides. It might well be the most accessible Breguet model, which is consistent with the Type XX’s recent history within the collection. Both references 2057 and 2067 share the same case specifications, meaning both are 42mm in diameter and 14.1mm thick. It may be visible from these photographs that Breguet has chosen to go back to the original design without fluting on the caseband, in order to pay homage to the tool watch spirit. While the size may raise some eyebrows, the style of the lugs (now sculpted and altogether more elegant, again in keeping with a certain style of lug design not seen since before Reference 3800) keeps it wearable across a variety of wrist sizes. As plenty of other commentators have pointed out, the Type XX watches are pilot’s watches, and these tend to wear large.
Perhaps contentiously, both watches keep the date between 4- and 5 o’clock, which might be the least popular date positions as far as collectors are concerned. On that note though, this position has been chosen very deliberately, given that the Swiss Made mark is below the window. The movement was also not simply thrown together, with both calibres 728 and 7281 being integrated chronographs. We salute the manufacture for the courage of its convictions.
Aside from size and ergonomics, References 2057 and 2067 differ entirely, right down to the type of lume used and the style of hands. Where Reference 2057 features pencil hands and fresh green lume, Reference 2067 has lance hands and aged lume. The former is a bicompax chronograph (small seconds at 9 o’clock and 30-minute totaliser at 3 o’clock), the latter is tricompax (small seconds at 9 o’clock, 15-minute totaliser at 3 o’clock and 12-hour totaliser at 6 o’clock). The arrangement of subdials is indicative of the different movements here, calibre 7281 for reference 2057, and calibre 728 for reference 2067. In terms of substance, both calibres have a lot in common though, especially in the fast-beat (5 Hz) all high-tech silicon escapements (hairspring, anchor and escape wheel), and the 60-hour power reserve.
The two chronograph calibres are new, and are integrated rather than modular. In our original story on the Type XX watches, this was a mere supposition on our part, but we see that Breguet CEO Lionel a Marca has confirmed this (in comments to Revolution). For some context here, it would have been simpler for Breguet to use a base movement that it could mount slightly different chronograph modules on, but the brand rightly concluded that this would be decidedly unattractive for Breguet, given the history of the name. Thus we have two integrated chronograph movements that add to the value proposition of the Type XX collection.
Both calibres are distinguished by column wheels and vertical clutches; of course, this chronograph is of the flyback variety so that function is in the mix too. We published an extensive read on the chronograph in our last regular issue (#70) but, in short, the vertical clutch here means that the chronograph wheel, which must connect with the movement to get the chronograph going, is held above and away from the seconds wheel by a pair of clamps. These disengage when the chronograph is activated, dropping the chronograph wheel onto the cannon pinion that also holds the seconds wheel. In this way, the chronograph is driven by same force as the seconds wheel, without any meshing of gears.
Type 102 Siderometer split-seconds chronograph for aircraft use from 1945
In practice, you will not see anything much, which is a downside of the vertical clutch – the horizontal clutch offers far more visual spectacle – but there will be a real performance upside. Chronographs with vertical clutches can typically run without negatively impacting the amplitude of the balance, which is caused by the above-mentioned meshing of teeth. Dial-side, this typically means there will be no jerk or backlash when the sweep seconds hand starts.
As far as finishing goes, Breguet demonstrated how bevelling and other fine touches are done at the Paris launch (during the museum tour), without calling attention to anything that is done by hand in these new calibres. Nevertheless, we note that the finish is as good as anything at this level of fine watchmaking, including the aforementioned bevelling on the chronograph levers. Breguet collectors will note that the finishing here is much simpler than what one might expect for the Tradition and Classique collections, but again stand up quite well to what one will find in the Marine collection.
With regards to Reference 2057, the bidirectional rotating bezel is fluted and free of markings, except for the triangle at the top. The onion-shaped crown stays true to the original design of the military Type 20. One black calfskin leather strap and one black NATO fabric strap are provided. They are both designed with interchangeability in mind so you can swap them quickly without the need of a tool. The lugs are pretty standard, with spring bars and all, so other strap options are open too.
On the other hand, Reference 2067 follows the code established by a civilian Type XX watch of 1967. Here, it is interesting to note that the enlarged minute counter at three o’clock is graduated for 15 minutes (and not 30 minutes like most chronographs). This allows the minute chapters to be farther apart for easier reading, and there is the 12-hour counter at 6 o’clock to provide a longer overview of the timing session.
Note also how the main hour and minute hands are more triangular and reminiscent of the lances used by cavalry than Reference 2057 – this explains why watch enthusiasts everywhere call this type of hands "lance hands"; the lume is now in a shade of ivory. Other differences include the 12-hour graduation on the bezel and the straight-sided flat crown, which is the same design as the civilian Type XX back in those earliest days. Reference 2067 is worn on a brown calfskin leather strap and the extra NATO fabric strap comes in black, same as its sibling.
Both models are delivered in an interestingly designed box that resembles a vintage aircraft wing when viewed from the side. It comprises a leather flap atop a wooden structure. A built-in, internal slot provides practical storage for the strap not currently in use. For WOW, it is the perfect antidote to the trend where watch boxes are made of recycled or recyclable materials.
This article first appeared on WOW’s Legacy 2024 issue
For more on the latest in watch reads, click here.
Blancpain's Final Fathoms
Cannes, in the south of France, is probably most famed for its annual film festival, and known besides as a bit of a summer playground. It is not particularly well regarded for its horological chops; it is just a little too pleasant, if anything. Surprisingly, it served as the inspiration for the world’s first dive watch, the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Well, not what you see on shore or even the beautiful waterfront setting, but what lies beneath the waves. In 1950, Jean-Jacques Fiechter assumed the role of Blancpain's CEO, and he harboured a deep passion for diving. In those days, recreational diving was in its infancy, with SCUBA apparatus having only been introduced in 1943 by famed diver and marine biologist Jacques-Yves Cousteau.
Diving was perilous and unpredictable, and Jean-Jacques learned this the hard way. During a dive near Cannees, he found himself 50 metres below the surface, dangerously low on air and without a watch to time his emergency ascent. He later remarked that "passion makes one forget the time." Thankfully, Jean-Jacques had another passion – watchmaking. Recognising the need for a precise, reliable, and robust dive watch, he embarked on a mission to create the ideal timepiece.
The Blancpain Fifty Fathoms Act 3 was revealed in Cannes, France, as the final watch in a year-long celebration for the world’s first true dive watch. There was plenty of speculation prior to this, especially after Blancpain dropped some teasers that proved very slightly misleading (a reference to German silver that gave away nothing). The watch is indeed a time-only 41.3mm dive instrument that does not make space for a date; the 6 o’clock position is instead occupied by the mil-spec water-resistance mark (denoting if moisture has compromised the case) of the military watches of the 1960s.
Going For Bronze
The size of the watch is universally accepted as following the example of the 1953 Fifty Fathoms, but the specific reference this watch looks to sparks debate. Some experts point to 1967 specifically and Blancpain itself only included a reference to a 1964 model, but in reality, the Final Fathoms (as we have taken to calling it) is an unprecedented new model. There are no complicated twists, although there is a movement upgrade, yet the case itself is remarkable, being bronze gold. Perhaps this is a reference to the bronzed look once synonymous with a place like Cannes, as well as the weathered looks of both professional and amateur mariners. If bronze gold sounds familiar to you, you are not imagining things.
Seasoned collectors no doubt recall bronze gold from Omega now, and as early as 2021, when it debuted. The material now makes an appearance at Blancpain; both brands are part of the Swatch Group so this not unexpected. In fact, we feel this is a fair exchange of expertise, given that Blancpain supplies the know- how behind Omega’s groundbreaking Chrono Chime. Visually, the idea behind the Fifty Fathoms Act 3 is clearly to reinforce vintage vibes, as all standard bronze watches usually do. On the other hand, this is not regular bronze... As a quick recap and update on bronze gold, here is what you need to know: The gold in the alloy makesup 37.5 percent of the total material, with copper making up the majority (50 percent). Silver, palladium and gallium make up the remainder.
For anyone who plans to wear this watch, which is limited to 555 pieces worldwide, you should note that some patination can be expected but nothing on the order of standard bronze. Blancpain says it can be worn against the skin, and some social media reports and rumours at the launch event suggest that there may be minor differences between the bronze gold Blancpain is using and that Omega used. Furthermore, it seems the exclusivity of bronze gold will remain with Blancpain for the near term – again this is based on unconfirmed remarks at the launch, by Blancpain representatives. It may be that none of this pans out but the case material bears some serious consideration and we recommend all prospective owners ask as many questions as they want of the product experts at Blancpain.
Tempestuous References
On that note, you might wonder why 555 pieces, in particular. Blancpain points us in the direction of Ariel’s Song from The Tempest (William Shakespeare), where the name Fifty Fathoms emerged in 1953. The line is “Full fathom five thy father lies,” so perhaps 555 is some sort of alliterative tribute... For those who care about such matters, this means that there will be more Act 3 watches out there than Act 1 pieces. This will create interesting collection imbalances but this is hardly raising hackles in the collector community yet.
Now, there is a bit of a kerfuffle about the Fifty Fathoms in general, with Perezscope digging up dead horses just to flog them to death again. Somewhat conveniently, it has been forgotten that only the Fifty Fathoms debuted with a unidirectional bezel, so how it could be a copy of something else is beyond us. That covers our thoughts on this subject but suffice to say also that it is not relevant to the current Final Fathoms model. The case material is, and the characteristics of the design are. On that note, the shape of the case and of the lugs (lug-to- lug measurements are not available but we estimate something in the 50mm+ range) is new, although it obviously is a round watch, basically.
Consequently, if you can typically wear a 42mm watch without any overhang, but that is the maximum, you will find the Final Fathoms challenging. The exhibition caseback showcases a new evolution of movement for Blancpain, with the calibre 1154.P2 featuring an escapement with silicon hairspring and a new escape wheel in antimagnetic alloys – Blancpain did not say what exactly this alloy is, but we remain curious as to why the brand does not simply use the Breguet and Omega solution of more silicon-based parts for the balance assembly. Another solution is nickel- phosphorus, and that might be the alloy here. The goal was to produce an antimagnetic movement that could withstand 1,000 Gauss without the protection of a soft iron inner case; calibre 1154.P2 makes the grade, hence the presence of an exhibition caseback.
Best in Class
Anyway, the movement has 100 hours of power reserve, making it a class leader, and reminding the world at large that Blancpain still leads the way in terms of standard-issue power reserve for mechanical dive watches. The launch event in Cannes was suitably momentous. This was the scene of the original inspiration for the Fifty Fathoms, and it perhaps represents the scene of the dawn of the recreational diving era. The international launch did make a lot of room for the military history of the Fifty Fathoms, and its acceptance as a tool watch, but the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms of the 21st century has transcended those roots. A bronze gold dive watch is not a professional tool but it might still represent professional passions.
On that note, though not necessarily to prove any point, the price of USD 44,800 will disappoint some, and certainly demands due consideration. Ultimately, we think there will be more than enough demand for the Final Fathoms, such that the price will not be an issue. The Final Fathoms is, after all, an important milestone for Blancpain, and there are certainly far more than 555 people who will want one of these fantastic timepieces.
To finish up here with a note on the launch itself, which was a remarkable achievement, just by virtue of the fact that no leaks were published. Interest in the Final Fathoms had not only been boosted by the previous two Acts, but also the Swatch collaboration. Even with all the attendant curiosity swirling around the Final Fathoms, no one published anything ahead of time. For our part, neither WOW Singapore nor Thailand (the two editions covering the event from Cannes) received the embargoed information in advance. Blancpain managed to merge its diving heritage with its art of living concept thanks to the amazing Ille Saint-Marguerite location and the participation of personalities such as Laurent Ballesta. For more on this launch, and the exhibition of Blancpain’s ocean commitments at Cannes, see the event story deeper into this issue.
This article first appeared on WOW’s Legacy 2024 issue
For more on the latest in watch reads, click here.
The Precise Beauty of Grand Seiko
Photo courtesy of Grand Seiko
There are brands that are well-loved by collectors, journalists and people generally enthusiastic about buying watches. We will all have different opinions of what those brands are, but perhaps we can agree on one name: Grand Seiko. The Japanese imprint only emerged as a fully-fledged brand from the shadow of Seiko relatively recently, in 2017. However, everyone had been aware of Seiko’s intentions to spin-off Grand Seiko as its own full brand since an announcement at BaselWorld sometime after the line became available internationally. Technically though, it helps to consider that Grand Seiko is really a deeply rooted part of Seiko’s grand history, and it earned its right to stand on its own merits. Those merits needed to be well-established for Seiko to commit to an independent future for it. One way to understand all this is to visit Grand Seiko’s production facilities in Japan, which is obviously what we did.
Uniquely amongst our manufacture tours in this Legacy annual, we have very recently published a story on Grand Seiko’s industrial and artisanal bases. Despite the excellent story that WOW Thailand shared with us, we felt there was more to add; the story in the Summer issue this year only focusses on the new Grand Seiko Studio Shizukuishi (GSSS) while also establishing the Seiko connection via Seiko House. That story will serve as the launchpad for this one, though you need not have read it to enjoy this latest chapter. This is primarily because, for this visit, we got to see and experience the Atelier Ginza in Seiko House Ginza, where the Kodo is put together, as well as the operations in Nagano, at Seiko Epson. In fact, we could have crafted this whole story on what the previous story did not cover, meaning just the new sites, but we have chosen to do things a little differently.
Just as a watch is more than the sum of its parts, Grand Seiko is far more than just an amalgamation of multiple production sites. To begin with, it is important to consider that Grand Seiko watches are made entirely in Japan and that the considerable resources of Seiko need to be taken into consideration. As matter of practical facts, it is simply impossible to avoid GSSS because it is the reason this tour took place at all. At the same time, we know that our readers and collectors in general are hungry for facts about GSSS and we must oblige. Before we move on though, we will reiterate that Grand Seiko, and Seiko for that matter, do not just have one or two or even three production sites. For example, while we saw movement assembly and casing up at GSSS, the components manufacturing facility was in another adjacent building.
Photo courtesy of Grand Seiko
Delectable Pieces
In fact, the best place to discover this fact is at Seiko House Ginza, where the Atelier Ginza opened just last year. A small workshop, there is space for fewer than half a dozen watchmakers here, and only one was present when we visited (Time + Tide reports that there is at least one other watchmaker working here). At present, we are informed that the watchmakers here only work on the 9ST1 movement, which of course belongs the magnificent Kodo SLGT003. The watchmaker we met was none other than Takuma Kawauchiya himself, the man who developed the movement and who has won over legions of watch lovers and journalists. He showed the prototype of the movement and explained that Atelier Ginza is where Grand Seiko will work on mechanical watches of the highest order.
Its location, in the heart of Ginza, is no accident with Grand Seiko CEO Akio Naito (see our interview with him in this issue) confirming that Atelier Ginza is meant to be a sort of working showcase of the brand’s capabilities. It is a subtle exercise in brand communication, and allows collectors to easily see how something like the Kodo gets lovingly assembled. While the location, on the 7th floor of the building, is only accessible by appointment, it is made for visitors. Reinforcing this fact are the large see-through panels separating the foyer from the workspace. In a way, this mirrors the set-up at GSSS, and has pretty much the same effect. Also deeply enticing here is an oversized chocolate sculpture of the Kodo, which looks every bit as delectable as the watch; we wonder how often Grand Seiko has to have it replaced.
Back For Seconds
Given that Grand Seiko has a number of disparate locations for its manufacturing activities, we will return to this subject towards the end. For now, we note for the record that we are not presenting information here in chronological order. Since Atelier Ginza is spiritually linked with GSSS, we will move straight into that location now. Technically, the Seiko facilities in Morioka (the largest city in Iwate Prefecture, where GSSS is located) includes a number of production sites, including Morioka Seiko Instruments Inc, alongside the close-to 2,000sqm Grand Seiko Studio Shizukuishi. There is a lot to say about the GSSS, which was completed in 2020 just in time for the 60th anniversary of Grand Seiko (the first watch in the family of watches, which was then under Seiko).
On that note, there is an interesting display of history here, which is much more niche than the museum at Seiko House Ginza. Not only is the first Grand Seiko piece from 1960 included, so is the first Seiko watch, all the way back from 1913. This was the Laurel, which was also Japan’s first wristwatch; it is accompanied in a little display by the Marvel (1956) and the Crown (1959). This unassuming showcase illustrates that Grand Seiko’s legacy itself is far longer than its 60 years implies. While this note does take up a bit of space in our already constrained pages, an issue called Legacy cannot ignore something like this.
Perhaps the most obvious thing to note about GSSS is not the most important though, and that is its relatively compact size and status as a Kengo Kuma-design. If you visit, and the GSSS does accept visitors, the building itself will imprint itself onto your imagination and you will not soon forget it. As we have written in the aforementioned story in issue #69, everything in the GSSS is arranged on two levels, of which the ground level (seen here, opposite) is most prominent because this is where watchmaking work happens. Again, bear in mind that high complications such as the Kodo are not assembled here; on the other hand, the Tentagraph SLGC001 movement was assembled and finished here, as was the 9AS5 high-beat calibre. Casing up and testing also happens right here.
Springing Forward
Photo courtesy of Grand Seiko
Despite having much more to say about this, we must move on to our final stop before we run out of space and have to end abruptly. This last stop, at the Nagano facilities that produce the Spring Drive watches, turns out to be the most complicated. To begin with, the Seiko Epson production facility is not part of the Seiko Group or the Seiko Watch Corporation. As the name states, this is effectively a joint venture between Seiko and Epson. For collectors and enthusiasts, the key thing to keep in mind here is that Seiko Epson is all about Spring Drive, and quartz too. That means that it is also about another Seiko imprint, Credor, as well a brand that has nothing to do with Seiko, and everything to do with Epson: Orient.
Now, having said that, work on Grand Seiko watches happens in dedicated spaces that are not used for anything other than Grand Seiko. Helpfully, for an article like this one, there is a single name for this area: the Shinshu Watch Studio. With Credor and Grand Seiko, there are overlaps just as one might find at Ulysse Nardin and Girard- Perregaux (see elsewhere in this section). This is most evident in the Micro-Artist Studio, where special dials (the Credor Eichi II) and things such as the Credor chiming model come to life.
The Shinshu Watch Studio is the most manufacture- like set-up that we have seen on this visit, with finishing and assembly happening in separate areas. It is also the sort of space that showcases the industrial approach to making and finishing parts. Production of hands and indices are a great example here, with steel hands getting that signature blue colour through heat treatments that are standardized (an open oven, effectively, that allows many sets of hands to be blued at the same time). The polishing of indices is a revelation, for anyone who has ever ogled the little appliques on the dial and wondered if these are all individually polished. Well, they are and they are not; a batch of these, which are all equal after all, are loaded into a little housing implement that allows a machine to polish all the relevant surfaces. This means that batches must be tracked and subjected to multiple rounds of polishing, one of which you can see here (opposite page, bottom).
Photo courtesy of Grand Seiko
The above description has taken a good bit of space, and the reason for that is that it can be applied to virtually everything that happens at Seiko Epson for Grand Seiko. This includes everything from movement assembly and finishing (opposite page, top), to the making of cases and dials (including the Snowflake and of course Lake Suwa), and special touches such as Zaratsu polishing (creating the famed distortion-free reflection on the case surfaces, seen below). It is all traditional, but all done with the rigour and precision of contemporary machining techniques and technology. Movements made here include calibres 9F and 9RA5, and we think it only fitting that Spring Drive movements are still made in the facility (back when it was called Suwa Seikosha) that developed it more than 20 years ago.
If nothing else, the final section of this story simultaneously reveals how complicated Grand Seiko’s production regime is. On the other hand, this is part of a pattern, with the Kodo calibre not produced in Shizukuishi but Ginza; this has resulted in unfortunate but understandable publication errors (where images of SLGT003 have been used to illustrate stories on GSSS). Indeed, we are more wary of unforced errors in this story than anywhere else, but we are certain the more knowledgeable amongst you will not hesitate to point these out! As the closing story in this section on manufacturing sites, the narrative here ought to have convinced you that no manufacture is really the same as another because there are often strong variances even within the same brand. If you are not convinced yet, well come back next year and we will try again...
This article first appeared on WOW’s Legacy 2024 issue
For more on the latest in watch reads, click here.
Plan-Les-Watches: The Watchmaking Prowess Behind Patek Philippe
The foyer of the PP6 building, with subtle visual cues to the watchmaking activities inside
If you know anything about the practical side of making watches, you know that production is a sensitive topic. You might, for example, see news about some massive new structure that watchmaker A is building, and naturally wonder how many more watches will be made under that roof. Now, if you know a little more about watchmaking, it will not surprise you to learn that more watches are not on the cards – at least not right away, but certainly never to the extent that production will suddenly double.
While visiting the new Patek Philippe facility in Geneva’s Plan-les-Ouates neighbourhood (affectionately known as Plan-les-Watches or Plan-les-Watch), we are shown a staggering number of CNC (computer numerical control) machines. It was literally a show-stopping moment for the press tour, organised for Southeast Asia media, especially for those of us who understood that CNC machines can run 24/7. For a moment, this writer considered just how many brass movement blanks could be produced at the new PP6 facility with the multi-axis CNC machines. That foolish moment passed quickly though because Patek Phlippe helpfully informed us that gears, pinions and arbours (also produced here, with different CNC machines in a process called bar-turning, where the raw material bars turn but the tools are fixed) needed to be finished by hand. Anything with teeth, really. To be blunt here, this literally means that every spoke of every wheel gets some individual attention, however miniscule it might be.
Pulling back a little from this specific close-up, the reality of watch manufactures is often surprising because these sites are often huge – the new facility we visited stands 34m high, with 10 storeys (four are underground, which Patek Philippe literally describes as subterranean, in good old secret lair style) for a total of 133,650sqm. Obviously, the site is massive yet Patek Philippe’s production volume of 70,000 watches (that is the top-end estimate; Patek Philippe does not disclose specific production numbers) seems relatively low. What is required here is an establishing scene, so let us take you back to 2019, in the Before-Times – let us go back even further than this, for a bit of context.
One of many movement blank or platine producing machines
In The Beginning...
Patek Philippe has been on a mission to expand and enhance its capabilities since the firm came to life in 1839, and certainly since the Stern family took over in the 1930s. In all this time, wealth has become more democratised, and timepieces found themselves on the wrists of more people than ever before. Bear this in mind when you visit the Patek Philippe Salons in Geneva – one of three owned and operated by the brand itself – because this space used to house the watchmakers. When the advent of quartz technology put paid to many a storied name, and even sent the watchmaking trade into decline, those firms that soldiered on – Patek Philippe amongst them – found that they had to take steps to protect the entire industry. As a matter of fact, the Patek Philippe Museum occupies a space formerly used by one of its suppliers, now turned in-house division – the famed bracelet-maker Ateliers Reunis. While both Salons and Museum are impressive, they cannot compare with the most recent addition to Patek Philippe’s manufacturing facilities.
By the time Thierry Stern succeeded as President of Patek Philippe, he was building on the work of his predecessor, his father Philippe. The elder Stern had announced the building of a manufacturing site at Plan-les-Ouates in 1996, and that was ready by the time the younger Stern took over in 2009. To make a long story somewhat shorter, Patek Philippe decided that even more workspace was needed, but had to fit in the existing footprint of site; the existing facilities were contemporary but simply not keeping pace with future needs. The solution unfolded in multiple stages, and work on the building known as PP6 (the subject of this story) began in earnest in 2015. Obviously, Thierry Stern wanted something big, and PP6 fits the bill. While this itself is a great story, we are more interested in what might enlighten collectors and those still waiting for their shot at a Patek Philippe watch.
Square plate with platine emerging from the aforementioned CNC machine; bevelling a balance bridge
Returning to the CNC machines and the shaping of parts with teeth, this is actually where one can learn something interesting and possibly specific to Patek Philippe. Not singularly distinctive because the manufacture is the greatest and best or whatever but just a rational method of working that the Geneva brand has adopted. The gist of it is this: the base plates made here are not meant for complicated movements, but the parts with teeth are shared between all types of calibres. Different machines produce plates and bridges for complicated watches. Why should this be so? The explanation given, and what we know ourselves, is that complicated movements components, including plates and bridges, are thicker than normal. These are filed down to the appropriate dimensions (still thicker than standard movements) because the skilled hands of a craftsperson can handle more complex and delicate actions than even CNC machines can.
Worked By Hand
The tourbillon bridge is a great and commonly used example, because the rough part is worked over by hand quite intensely. Extra material also helps ameliorate minor errors, which are inevitable. Gears and pinions, on the other hand, can be made to one standard specification. Not that any brand discusses matters like errors but they do happen because if you take off too much while bevelling, for example, there is no going back; this writer knows that from experience, given that tolerances here are beyond what the naked eye can apprehend. Suffice to say here that those who are looking for reasons why Patek Philippe might be production-limited – even with automated processes in the mix – can find one important point in the hobbing process, and what follows after. Hobbing is the technical term for the production of teeth on parts.
Circular graining being applied to the base plate of the Grand Master Chime calibre.
Unfortunately, space-constraints limit us as much as they do a watchmaker such as Patek Philippe, so we must move on for a little bit to bracelets and metiers d’art. We would have loved to tell you more about movement assembly but that was not on the cards on this occasion, and this operation actually takes place in another building here at the Plan-les-Ouates manufacture. On that note, we would be remiss not to mention the Advanced Research department at Patek Philippe, which is on the third floor of PP6. Unfortunately, this was not part of the tour this time, although we hold out some hope that it will be in future. Having a reason to return to the Patek Philippe manufacture is no reason to complain.
And so, on to bracelets we go, and this one will be popular with the broader watch enthusiast world. Of course, the bracelets we saw in production were for the Nautilus, which might be tied for most exclusive and most famous watch bracelet in the world – the GOATs of bracelets, one might say. It is always amazing to see bracelets taking shape, link by link, although it must be said that the raw material here arrives in the form of a bar that is in the rough dimensions required (complete with a groove in the middle). Famously, there are 55 steps involved in making the Nautilus bracelet, and Patek Philippe did set aside quite a bit of time to get into this. Now, you might wonder why all the fuss over bracelets but of all the manufactures we visited this year, Patek Philippe is alone in showing the world how it makes its bracelets in its own manufacture. Indeed, most watch brands outsource the production of bracelets to a specialist, but Patek Philippe acquired its own supplier many years ago (as noted briefly above).
Case Study
To continue with the making of bracelets, the shaped bars are sent into the bar-fed machining centre to form individual links. This is a milling process, to keep things succinct, and involves many quality-control steps as well as hand-correction, but these are not part of the 55 steps. As you know, there are two main parts to the bracelet links – the H-shaped bit and the centre link – and these are individually worked before being assembled (with pins). Even after being assembled, there is still buffing and chamfering to be done, and the centre links are actually polished further to achieve the signature mirror polishing. This is done by protecting the H-links with perforated masking tape and polishing the length of the assembled bracelet.
Moving on to case-making, we have just about enough space to get into another famous Patek Philippe signature, the hobnail case- middle decoration (which also appears on bezels sometimes). This is a Clous de Paris guilloche technique done with a hand operated comb and plane lathe. You will have to imagine the technique required to maintain the right amount of pressure here (the part moves while the lathe remains still). On the making of the cases themselves, this is pretty straight-forward, with bar-turning (just as movement components are made), milling, stamping and polishing in the mix. We note for the record that Patek Philippe is also amongst the few watchmaking firms that produce their own cases, and have invested heavily to bring this know-how in-house.
A gem-setter working with baguette-cut diamonds on a bezel. This work takes a great deal of patience and plenty of manual dexterity - there are no machines involved here
Finally, we will spare the last word for Rare Handcrafts, even though it means we must leave complications prematurely here and have just a word or two left for gem-setting in captions. Our tour included a demonstration of champleve enamelling, which is only one of 12 techniques that all enamellers at Patek Philippe are proficient with. The champleve technique involves painting inside the lines, which are basically cavities carved into a dial, and this technique is particularly suited to letting enthusiasts have a go, as you can see here.
A demonstration of all techniques would either be cursory or take days (if you visited the Grand Exhibition [in Tokyo or in Singapore in 2019], this part of the tour is a bit like that segment), and one must bear in mind that Patek Philippe also has other artisans working on dials at specialist dialmaker Cadrans Fluckiger in St. Imier. It also engages external specialists such as Anita Porchet, whom some of you will have met or seen in action in Singapore, while also allowing other artisans to work from home on their own machines.
On that note, the Patek Philippe manufacture is a sort of home for watches, where they are lovingly prepared to be sent out into the world. Spare a thought for this the next time you look at your own Patek Philippe because someone at home in Geneva is trying to imagine you finding immense pleasure in said watch. If a Patek Philippe is still on your horizon, we hope this story plays its part in convincing you that it is worth inching towards that imaginary line.
This article first appeared on WOW's Legacy 2024 issue
For more on the latest in watch reads, click here.